英文范围示例
Choose a prototype or a coded feasibility experiment
A key user journey or technical assumption is unresolved. Agree the decision the work should support before building a full product.
Choose an architecture audit when an existing system needs evidence-backed findings rather than a new concept prototype.比较选项
您将获得什么
- Clickable prototype: an agreed screen journey for review, not production software.
- Coded proof of concept: a bounded experiment against an agreed technical question.
- Decision record with observed limits, evidence gaps and next-phase requirements.
需要准备什么
- Workflow owner, sample records and review participants.
- The unresolved question, access constraints and what would count as useful evidence.
- A decision-maker for proceeding, changing direction or stopping.
另行约定
- Production hardening, full integrations, migration and operating support.
- Screen/workshop/revision quantities, real-user sessions and deliverable file access are agreed.
- A feasibility experiment does not guarantee production reliability or AI accuracy.
查看示例
Illustrative automation experiment: route an enquiry from an approved sample set, show the proposed classification to a person, and record corrections and exceptions. Compare observed behavior with a stated acceptance rule before authorizing production integration.
Acceptance example. The review can identify what was demonstrated, which inputs were tested, what remains unverified and the decision owner. An infeasible result is a documented decision, not a hidden failure.
Read the sample scope, acceptance and handover recordsCan another developer use the prototype?
Specify deliverable files, design/source access, third-party licences and explanatory notes in the scope. A clickable prototype is not a ready-to-deploy application.
Which discovery scope fits?
Use a clickable prototype to review the user journey. Use a coded experiment to test a technical assumption. Agree paid scope only after the initial conversation.
选择适合您的探索方式
选择能帮助您作出决定的最小验证步骤。可点击原型用于评审页面与业务流程，另行约定范围的代码概念验证用于检查技术可行性。两者都不是可正式上线的软件。
先预约免费战略会议。如果范围或集成需求尚不明确，可选择付费探索。开工前我们会约定交付物与固定费用。即使您决定停止项目，也可保留约定成果。
我们交付什么
选择能解答您下一步产品决策的服务。
比较可行方案、预估费用与技术风险，再决定下一步。
蓝图 + 可点击原型在明确范围内的费用为 RM 3,500。开工前约定工作坊、页面、所需资料、修改次数与日期。代码概念验证与正式开发另行报价。
评估哪些工作可通过自动化或 AI 减少人工操作。我们审查业务流程、数据与集成需求，在确认技术可行性和专家档期后提供开发报价。
我们如何与您合作
明确需要解答的问题，评审验证结果，再决定开发什么。
分享您的构想
说明您希望实现的结果及相关业务流程。我们协助您明确需要解答的问题。
我们规划并构建原型
选择技术路线图与架构审计来评审系统设计，或选择蓝图 + 可点击原型来评审业务流程与页面。开工前约定工作坊、所需资料、修改次数与日期。代码概念验证另行约定范围与价格。
评审与验证
根据验收标准评审约定页面或可行性结果。提案列明修改轮次。新增需求先估算费用，并取得书面批准后才开始。
决定下一步
根据结果选择继续、调整方向或停止。正式开发另行约定范围、价格与成果权利。
您可以期待什么
本地责任担当
直接与负责探索范围及结果的技术负责人合作。
可用于决策的成果
即使您决定不委托开发，也可保留约定交付物及其已知限制说明。
先确认费用
开工前确认费用与修改次数。补助资格请向计划管理方核实，我们的报价不以获得补助为前提。
独立决定是否开发
选择探索服务不代表承诺正式开发。评审结果后，再决定是否批准下一阶段。
常见问题
开始探索前，了解交付物、费用与下一步。