英文範圍示例
Choose a prototype or a coded feasibility experiment
A key user journey or technical assumption is unresolved. Agree the decision the work should support before building a full product.
Choose an architecture audit when an existing system needs evidence-backed findings rather than a new concept prototype.比較選項
您將獲得甚麼
- Clickable prototype: an agreed screen journey for review, not production software.
- Coded proof of concept: a bounded experiment against an agreed technical question.
- Decision record with observed limits, evidence gaps and next-phase requirements.
需要準備甚麼
- Workflow owner, sample records and review participants.
- The unresolved question, access constraints and what would count as useful evidence.
- A decision-maker for proceeding, changing direction or stopping.
另行約定
- Production hardening, full integrations, migration and operating support.
- Screen/workshop/revision quantities, real-user sessions and deliverable file access are agreed.
- A feasibility experiment does not guarantee production reliability or AI accuracy.
查看示例
Illustrative automation experiment: route an enquiry from an approved sample set, show the proposed classification to a person, and record corrections and exceptions. Compare observed behavior with a stated acceptance rule before authorizing production integration.
Acceptance example. The review can identify what was demonstrated, which inputs were tested, what remains unverified and the decision owner. An infeasible result is a documented decision, not a hidden failure.
Read the sample scope, acceptance and handover recordsCan another developer use the prototype?
Specify deliverable files, design/source access, third-party licences and explanatory notes in the scope. A clickable prototype is not a ready-to-deploy application.
Which discovery scope fits?
Use a clickable prototype to review the user journey. Use a coded experiment to test a technical assumption. Agree paid scope only after the initial conversation.
選擇適合您的探索方式
選擇能幫助您作出決定的最小驗證步驟。可點擊原型用於評審頁面與業務流程，另行約定範圍的程式碼概念驗證用於檢查技術可行性。兩者都不是可正式上線的軟件。
先預約免費戰略會議。如果範圍或整合需求尚未明確，可選擇付費探索。開工前我們會約定交付物與固定費用。即使您決定停止項目，也可保留約定成果。
我們交付甚麼
選擇能解答您下一步產品決策的服務。
比較可行方案、預估費用與技術風險，再決定下一步。
藍圖 + 可點擊原型在明確範圍內的費用為 RM 3,500。開工前約定工作坊、頁面、所需資料、修改次數與日期。程式碼概念驗證與正式開發另行報價。
評估哪些工作可透過自動化或 AI 減少人手操作。我們審查業務流程、資料與整合需求，在確認技術可行性和專家檔期後提供開發報價。
我們如何與您合作
明確需要解答的問題，評審驗證結果，再決定開發甚麼。
分享您的構想
說明您希望實現的結果及相關業務流程。我們協助您明確需要解答的問題。
我們規劃並構建原型
選擇技術路線圖與架構審計來評審系統設計，或選擇藍圖 + 可點擊原型來評審業務流程與頁面。開工前約定工作坊、所需資料、修改次數與日期。程式碼概念驗證另行約定範圍與價格。
評審與驗證
根據驗收標準評審約定頁面或可行性結果。提案列明修改輪次。新增需求先估算費用，並取得書面批准後才開始。
決定下一步
根據結果選擇繼續、調整方向或停止。正式開發另行約定範圍、價格與成果權利。
您可以期待甚麼
本地責任擔當
直接與負責探索範圍及結果的技術負責人合作。
可用於決策的成果
即使您決定不委託開發，也可保留約定交付物及其已知限制說明。
先確認費用
開工前確認費用與修改次數。資助資格請向計劃管理方核實，我們的報價不以獲得資助為前提。
獨立決定是否開發
選擇探索服務不代表承諾正式開發。評審結果後，再決定是否批准下一階段。
常見問題
開始探索前，了解交付物、費用與下一步。