본문으로 건너뛰기

기술과 프로젝트 범위

Hermes (Allegro)

이 기술이 적합한 상황, 필요한 준비 사항과 운영 담당자를 확인하세요.

아래 상세 안내와 설명용 예시는 영어로 제공됩니다. 예시에 사용된 모든 업무 기록은 가상입니다.

Where Hermes (Allegro) fits

Assessing Allegro’s Kafka-based publish/subscribe system for an event architecture.

When to choose another approach

This specifically means Allegro Hermes. It is an architecture option, not a ready-made connector or a no-loss/throughput promise.

Worked example and evidence

Fictional order service: publish an event, deliver to a stock subscriber and record failures for review. A repeated event ID cannot reserve stock twice.

What you need to supply

Broker/Hermes versions, topic contracts, subscriber owners, delivery policy and replay needs.

What acceptance should demonstrate

Demonstrate duplication, unavailable subscribers, retry expiry and replay with traceable event IDs.

Running costs and responsibilities

Assign hosting, upgrades, retention, failed-message review and incident response.

Technical scope to confirm

Confirm deployment-specific delivery semantics and retries against versioned documentation.

A proposal should identify the systems and data, direction of sync, access feasibility, failure handling, named owners and included deliverables. Listing this technology does not imply a prebuilt connector, vendor partnership or included feature.

How are duplicate or failed messages handled?

Consumers need idempotency. Scope retries, expiry and manual recovery together, including when retention expiry makes recovery impossible.