メインコンテンツへスキップ

技術とプロジェクト範囲

Sentry

この技術の適した用途、必要な準備、運用担当者を確認します。

以下の詳しいガイドと説明用の事例は英語です。例に含まれる業務データは架空のものです。

Where Sentry fits

Application error triage tied to a release and affected workflow.

When to choose another approach

It cannot guarantee discovery before every affected user. Exclude sensitive inputs from capture.

Worked example and evidence

Fictional checkout failure: sanitized exception → release ID → maintainer triage → scoped fix → workflow verification. Exclude card data, message text and email.

What you need to supply

SDK versions, release process, capture fields, retention choices and incident owner.

What acceptance should demonstrate

A staging exception identifies its release. Inspect the transmitted event for redaction and sampling.

Running costs and responsibilities

Own volume costs, permissions, retention, alert routing and follow-up fixes.

Technical scope to confirm

Review SDK and server-side scrubbing for every field your app can send.

A proposal should identify the systems and data, direction of sync, access feasibility, failure handling, named owners and included deliverables. Listing this technology does not imply a prebuilt connector, vendor partnership or included feature.

What customer data is captured?

Review configuration and actual payloads. Define permitted fields and prevent sensitive data at collection instead of assuming defaults cover custom fields.