본문으로 건너뛰기

기술과 프로젝트 범위

TypeScript

이 기술이 적합한 상황, 필요한 준비 사항과 운영 담당자를 확인하세요.

아래 상세 안내와 설명용 예시는 영어로 제공됩니다. 예시에 사용된 모든 업무 기록은 가상입니다.

Where TypeScript fits

An application where changes to shared data contracts are difficult to track.

When to choose another approach

Types are erased at runtime. User, API and stored inputs still need validation.

Worked example and evidence

Fictional order app: rename a delivery field in a maintained contract, update affected callers and reject an invalid date from a vendor.

What you need to supply

Source, compiler configuration, API contracts, dependency types and risky change areas.

What acceptance should demonstrate

The build catches incompatible callers and runtime validation rejects agreed invalid payloads.

Running costs and responsibilities

Maintain contracts, compiler settings and dependency types as the system changes.

Technical scope to confirm

Static checking does not replace authorization, runtime validation or behaviour review.

A proposal should identify the systems and data, direction of sync, access feasibility, failure handling, named owners and included deliverables. Listing this technology does not imply a prebuilt connector, vendor partnership or included feature.

Is rewriting all JavaScript necessary?

No blanket rewrite is required. Choose a bounded module or interface and confirm the value of incremental adoption.