Analisis Awal Berbayar
Peta Jalan Teknis & Audit Arsitektur
Rencanakan sistem custom atau tinjau sistem yang ada bersama Nodesify. Kami memetakan alur kerja, integrasi, dan risiko teknis, lalu menyusun peta jalan dengan lingkup jelas untuk membandingkan proposal implementasi.
Contoh lingkup dalam bahasa Inggris
An evidence-backed review with a defined boundary
You need to understand risk, maintainability or one critical workflow in an existing application before authorizing changes.
Choose a prototype when the primary uncertainty is a new user journey, rather than the system you already have.Bandingkan pilihan
Hasil yang Anda terima
- Reviewed asset list, system/data-flow map and evidence gaps.
- Prioritized findings with observed evidence, impact and next action.
- A review meeting and report acceptance criteria agreed for the selected boundary.
Yang perlu disiapkan
- Source/environment access or explicit limits if unavailable.
- System owner, relevant users and safe redacted records.
- One decision to support and the people who will review the findings.
Disepakati terpisah
- The one-workflow review is a bounded audit starting scope, not an unlimited system audit.
- Implementation/remediation and further discovery require a separate agreement.
- Any fee credit requires the applicable signed scope and credit conditions.
Lihat contoh
Illustrative finding structure: boundary → observed evidence → business impact → unresolved evidence → recommended action → owner. A sample report is not a claim of an observed failure in a customer system.
Acceptance example. Every finding identifies its evidence and uncertainty. The report distinguishes verified behavior from assumptions and states which assets or production conditions were not reviewed.
Read the sample scope, acceptance and handover recordsCan you review without production access?
Agree the permitted source, documentation and staging evidence. Findings must state limitations. Do not infer production reliability from a source-only review.
Is remediation included?
The audit produces agreed findings and recommendations. Fixes, implementation capacity and credit conditions require their own accepted scope.
Optional scoped discovery
Review One Business Workflow Before You Build
Choose one workflow with a clear starting point and outcome, such as payment to document delivery, enquiry to quotation, or approval to fulfilment. We agree the systems and decisions in scope before starting.
Discovery reference fee: Rp 12.300.000
The existing discovery fee applies to an agreed scope. Your proposal confirms the work, access, timing, and any credit toward a later build. Discovery is optional when requirements are already clear.
What We Need From You
- The workflow owner, users, desired outcome, and known failure cases.
- A walkthrough, available system documentation, and relevant sample data with sensitive details removed.
- Read-only access or agreed evidence for the systems in scope, plus business constraints and open decisions.
What You Receive
- A workflow and system-boundary map showing ownership, dependencies, and evidence gaps.
- Prioritised findings linked to the available evidence, with impact, recommended action, and unresolved questions.
- An implementation scope with acceptance criteria, dependencies, exclusions, and the next decisions needed for a proposal.
Illustrative Deliverables: ResumeForU
This example uses our own product to show the form of a review. It is not a client report or a claim that these issues occurred in production.
- Map purchase verification, resume-version capture, generation, preview, and download as separate steps.
- Record evidence for how generation failure preserves purchase rights, and identify any recovery behavior still needing validation.
- Define acceptance scenarios for a paid customer retrying a failed export without another purchase.
Scope Boundaries
One agreed workflow, not an unrestricted audit of the whole business. Implementation, production changes, coded prototypes, penetration testing, legal certification, and ongoing support need separate scopes. Timing depends on access, evidence, and stakeholder availability.
Tiga Risiko yang Perlu Ditinjau Sebelum Membangun
Batas Sistem Belum Jelas
Catat sistem yang memiliki setiap data, cara pertukaran data, dan penanganan integrasi yang gagal. Tentukan batasan yang memerlukan prototipe atau penelitian lebih lanjut.
Tanggung Jawab Data Belum Jelas
Petakan akses, penyimpanan, masa retensi, dan aliran data pihak ketiga. Catat kebutuhan keamanan serta pertanyaan untuk penasihat hukum atau kepatuhan Anda. Rancangan teknis bukan sertifikasi kepatuhan.
Perubahan Lingkup Belum Diberi Harga
Sepakati hasil kerja, pengecualian, ketergantungan, dan kriteria penerimaan. Catat pengaruh perubahan kebutuhan terhadap estimasi sebelum implementasi dimulai.
Apa yang Anda Terima: Cetak Biru Perusahaan Nodesify
Anda menerima rancangan teknis tertulis yang mencatat lingkup, keputusan arsitektur, asumsi, dan pertanyaan yang belum terjawab. Tim Anda dapat menggunakannya untuk merencanakan implementasi atau membandingkan proposal penyedia.
Diagram sistem dan aliran data yang menunjukkan komponen usulan, kepemilikan data, batas integrasi, dan kontrak API yang perlu divalidasi.
Catatan peran pengguna, batas akses, aliran data sensitif, dan kontrol teknis untuk dinilai saat implementasi. Penafsiran hukum serta sertifikasi independen memerlukan spesialis terpisah.
Pilihan teknologi dinilai berdasarkan sistem yang ada, kemampuan tim, dan beban kerja. Estimasi infrastruktur mencatat perkiraan penggunaan serta asumsi agar dapat diperbarui saat kebutuhan berubah.
Daftar pekerjaan bertahap dengan ketergantungan, kriteria penerimaan, dan pertanyaan terbuka. Pisahkan rilis pertama yang dapat digunakan dari pengembangan lanjutan dan tentukan kebutuhan analisis sebelum penawaran pasti.
Dari Kebutuhan Bisnis ke Peta Jalan yang Dapat Ditinjau
Tinjau Kebutuhan dan Lingkup (Hari 1–2)
Tinjau alur bisnis, pengguna, perkiraan beban kerja, dan sistem yang ada bersama penanggung jawab. Sepakati lingkup audit serta akses yang diperlukan.
Tinjau Teknologi dan Aset (Hari 3–5)
Periksa dokumentasi, antarmuka, dan aset teknis yang tersedia. Catat risiko integrasi serta bukti yang belum tersedia tanpa mengasumsikan perilaku sistem yang tidak terdokumentasi.
Rancang Arsitektur dan Data (Hari 6–8)
Susun pilihan arsitektur, batas data, dan lingkup bertahap. Tentukan keputusan teknis yang memerlukan prototipe atau peninjauan spesialis sebelum implementasi.
Tinjau dan Serahkan Rancangan (Hari 9–10)
Tinjau rancangan, asumsi, risiko, dan keputusan terbuka bersama tim Anda. Serahkan dokumentasi yang disepakati serta langkah berikutnya berdasarkan prioritas.
Analisis Hanya Dibebankan Sekali
Biaya audit dibayarkan untuk penilaian dengan ruang lingkup yang telah ditentukan. Jika pengaturan untuk mengurangi biaya ini disepakati untuk proyek berikutnya, biaya tersebut dihitung satu kali dalam total harga proyek yang ditandatangani.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Berhenti Menebak. Mulai Merancang Arsitektur.
Tetapkan lingkup perangkat lunak, risiko integrasi, dan langkah penyerahan berikutnya melalui Peta Jalan Teknis dan Audit Arsitektur.